Jump to content

Spitfire Mk4 Rear Spring Rebuild


Douglas

Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm rebuilding my Spitfire Mk4 rear spring but I'm not certain I have the correct pads/buttons.  When I stripped it I'm pretty sure I removed 8 pads but I've been given 4 new ones and that seems to tie with the parts manual.  The new pads are cylindrical and about 7/8th inch diameter and 1/8th inch high.  (See picture).  Do I have the correct pads?  Do I need 8?  Any other tips for reassembly?

Thanks

Doug

spring pads.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/03/2024 at 20:51, Douglas said:

Hi

I'm rebuilding my Spitfire Mk4 rear spring but I'm not certain I have the correct pads/buttons.  When I stripped it I'm pretty sure I removed 8 pads but I've been given 4 new ones and that seems to tie with the parts manual.  The new pads are cylindrical and about 7/8th inch diameter and 1/8th inch high.  (See picture).  Do I have the correct pads?  Do I need 8?  Any other tips for reassembly?

Thanks

Doug

spring pads.jpg

 

Firstly, I think you  may have made a wise  move by restoring your old spring rather than going for a new one, as a surprising number of people ( including me ) have found new some springs  to be very disappointing .I sent one back to a well-known supplier, (who readily refunded me, to be fair)

For a Mk 1V,  Ie with swing spring, there would have been eight of these.

There seems to have been two different diameters.

Originals were made of rubber.

Other more  suitable materials have been used which are longer -lasting

- including Teflon, polyurethane,Acetal.The most wear resistant  is probably UHWPE* - ultra high weight polyethylene.

Different thicknesses of these ‘ buttons’ or ‘insulators’ can influence ride- height  significantly ( though this can be usefully exploited if the spring has sagged to some extent)

* I made some from this material, turning them from 41. mm bar stock  on a lathe.

It is quite a cheap material but because  of its extraordinary ‘ tough / slipperiness’, I found it really frustratingly difficult to work with  -producing a growing pile of failures to get eight good ones!

( btw Acetal , perhaps second best to UHWPE   but superior to Teflon,  is  very easy to turn )

CE4718BB-2393-4C25-8570-14EF60411BDD.thumb.jpeg.55bc3431854e9a96b6dbc3dc97b90b77.jpeg6F5EA87E-EDC3-4F4E-85A9-75AB813B3161.thumb.jpeg.a99a1fdc95e9bdb17d68fcfa364e1f7f.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/03/2024 at 17:08, PhilDav said:

On Facebook, there is group "Triumph Spitfire Owners" 

The moderator on this is Rob P Turner" 

I think he had a stack of these buttons made, for a nominal charge. 

Thanks both!  Looks like I do need more isolators and of a different shape - more as you've shown Auldman - rather than the cylindrical ones I have.  Hopefully that will be all I need!  

Cheers

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...