Jump to content

RON recommendation (Pi)


frenchiemk2

Recommended Posts

Hi, RON is to do with the resistance the fuel has to ignition under compression not protection of the valve seats which is something lead offered. If the octane (RON number) is too low the fuel will ignite too soon leading to pinking (rattling noise under load) and, if excessive, damage to the engine. As you have access to 98 you shouldnt have this problem and can even try 95 which I find works perfectly in my Vitesse although on long fast runs I do add a combined octane booster/lead substitute (Millers VSPe)... 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pi cars were intended to run on "Five Star" fuel - 100 octane!

Part of lead's action as a fuel additive was for anti-knock, or pinking, and without it 98 is the best that is available, unless you live near a race circuit or aerodrome where AvGas at 100 octane may be sold.     My Vitesse has Pi, and a CR of 10.5, which is at the limit for low octane fuel, but I find it runs fine, no pinking, on 98 Octane.   I favour Shell's V-Plus.

BUT, to get the octane rating up there, modern fuels have additives that are volatile, when tetra-ethyl lead was not volatile at all.   Today, fuel that has sat in the tank for more than a month or so may no longer be at 98 octane.    Run your tank down to the minimum before winter storage, or else add a 'fuel stabiliser'.

John

PS Europe uses the "RON" (Research Octane Number) to classify fuel.     In the US they use MON (Motor Octane Number). which gives a lower number for the same fuel.  (98 RON is the same as 90 MON)  J.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please dont forget theres the same energy available in all of these RON fuels so a higher rating doesnt necessarily mean more power. If your car runs well (pinking as specified) with the correct ignition timing on 95 then theres no benefit going to a higher RON. Some people even consider using a higher RON and increasing advance more than the recommended setting which is even more ridiculous...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, thescrapman said:

You can Aral in Germany that is over 100, (101 or 104 I think) and like rocket fuel. 

So many believe this!     There is no more energy in 100 octane fuel than in fuels of lesser octane rating.   The octane number ONLY refers to its resistance to knock, pre-ignition.    This does mean that you can run much higher compression which will generate more power, and modern engines that have engine management and knock sensors to adjust ignition automatically will produce less power with low octane fuel, but those are due to engine tune and timing, not the 'power' of the petrol!

John 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/09/2023 at 08:33, JohnD said:

The Pi cars were intended to run on "Five Star" fuel - 100 octane!

Part of lead's action as a fuel additive was for anti-knock, or pinking, and without it 98 is the best that is available, unless you live near a race circuit or aerodrome where AvGas at 100 octane may be sold.     My Vitesse has Pi, and a CR of 10.5, which is at the limit for low octane fuel, but I find it runs fine, no pinking, on 98 Octane.   I favour Shell's V-Plus.

BUT, to get the octane rating up there, modern fuels have additives that are volatile, when tetra-ethyl lead was not volatile at all.   Today, fuel that has sat in the tank for more than a month or so may no longer be at 98 octane.    Run your tank down to the minimum before winter storage, or else add a 'fuel stabiliser'.

John

PS Europe uses the "RON" (Research Octane Number) to classify fuel.     In the US they use MON (Motor Octane Number). which gives a lower number for the same fuel.  (98 RON is the same as 90 MON)  J.

John,

We don't use MON here in the USA. Nothing that simple. We use "pump octane" This is found by adding RON to MON and dividing by two.

I just filled my Spitfire with 93 "pump octane" fuel. The RON and MON ratings are not displayed at the pump. 93 is the highest octane available in my part of the States. Other sections have only 91.

 Regards,

Paul

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, drofgum said:

John,

We don't use MON here in the USA. Nothing that simple. We use "pump octane" This is found by adding RON to MON and dividing by two.

I just filled my Spitfire with 93 "pump octane" fuel. The RON and MON ratings are not displayed at the pump. 93 is the highest octane available in my part of the States. Other sections have only 91.

 Regards,

Paul

Well, you do use MON rating in the US, but make it even more complicated by taking the mean between the two!    " 93" is a  bit lower than the mean of 98 and 90, so bad luck!

JOhn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but that was to reduce oxides of nitrogen in the emissions, which contribute to smog.

On fuel and alcohol, it's worth noting that pure alcohol is a superb knock suppressant!      While a CR of 10.5 is about the limit with 98 octane fuel, cars to run on ethanol can be built to have a CR of 14:1 !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2023 at 09:56, JohnD said:

So many believe this!     There is no more energy in 100 octane fuel than in fuels of lesser octane rating.   The octane number ONLY refers to its resistance to knock, pre-ignition.    This does mean that you can run much higher compression which will generate more power, and modern engines that have engine management and knock sensors to adjust ignition automatically will produce less power with low octane fuel, but those are due to engine tune and timing, not the 'power' of the petrol!

John 

This was in an early PI car with timing tweaked to most advantageous and a TR4 with higher compression than usual and again tweaked ignition.

Cars even sounded different to normal.

Guess they were just making better use of the energy within the fuel, especially as both were designed for 5-star.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certainly higher compression is likely to need an increase in fuel octane and I also wonder if there can be differences between standard engines of the same type. Some owners report they need one fuel while others are happy with something different so could engine wear or settings or combustion chamber carbon build up be factors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...