hurricane36 Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 Has anyone machined a 2.5 TC head (529879 / 219016 / 313248) from 3.475" thick down to 3.300" thick and if so has there/was there any issues? Having a look at the casting I think I can see where it was just increased in thickness on the bottom (block face) from 0.197" (5mm) to 0.355" (9mm) thick. This junction is in the region of where a 3.300" thickness would be. So it looks like Triumph did not change the internal casting former occupied by the water in the head. Any confirmation or not would be helpful. If there was an issue I might be able to use dome top pistons. ta Kevin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 I was told they suffered from lots of core shift so you may well end up with a scrap head. Might be better to look for a flat top head to start with. There was a very long no a detailed thread on the old forum about someone's issues with a skimmed head that broke into the waterways. Can't remember who it was sadly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky_spit Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 I think it was Bruce who had the issues with core shift and had a skimmed 6 pot head break through to the water passage? Maynards and Gareth T were involved with trying to fix it for him if I remember correctly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Hutchings Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 On 17/06/2020 at 10:36, thescrapman said: There was a very long detailed thread on the old forum Here tis: https://www.clubtriumph.co.uk/forums/topic/2058-mk2-head-wrecked/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnD Posted July 3, 2021 Share Posted July 3, 2021 Hurricane, Did you pick a skim of 175 thou out of the air, or did you calculate it? It sounds to me like a lot more than is needed to get 9.5:1. I would humbly refer you to my article, "How To Raise The Compression Ratio, Safely And Effectively" at https://sideways-technologies.co.uk/forums/index.php?/topic/7551-how-to-raise-the-compression-ratio-safely-and-effectively/. If you have measured the chamber volumes, and done the sums, then fine! Go ahead! John Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jones Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 Presumably this is to use on a 2L engine with flat-top pistons? Otherwise you don't need to take anything like that much off......... I can tell you for sure that it can be done. I have a 219016 head on my Vitesse engine which is 2L with flat-top pistons. That has a CR of 10.25:1, though that is partly achieved with a 0.005" piston pop-up. I'm not sure what the final thickness is, but it's less than 3.30" for sure. However - it was HUGE skim (two in fact). It's razor thin under the plugs and I was lucky not to strike water in the squish areas of the combustion chambers, which seems to be the usual problem area. Blind luck really as I didn't really know what I was doing at the time. It's lasted well - done in 2008-ish and probably 45k miles since. It's been off and refitted once (bottom end swap) - I was concerned about bits breaking off under the plugs, but it survived. As mentioned above, it was Bruce who had problems with the squish/fire-ring area collapsing. Not on one head, but two. The story of the second is here. https://sideways-technologies.co.uk/forums/index.php?/topic/706-cylinder-head-woes/ Eventually resolved by starting with a factory 3.30" head. Which is to be much preferred, if you can find a decent one. Not so easy these days. NIck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.