smithy Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 My Spit IV has a GT6 engine and the diff whines horribly and has a runny nose. It's a 72, so the ratio's 3.89 I suspect. I believe the "sensible" replacement's a 3.63, which is the same casing but contains the same cog ratio as the TR7 - and is "as fitted" to the GT6 Mk 3's. Am I right?James excellent site http://www.mintylamb.co.uk/gearspeed/ tells me what the differences I can expect in terms of numbers with the diff swapped, but I'm having difficulty reconciling the seperate notions I have that the car will accelerate faster (?) with a 3.63 diff, AND have a "taller" top gear (ie: make more MPH for the revs - be a better cruiser). I suspect one of those notions is wrong - I think I probably do know which, but any info/opinions raspberries gratefully received! BTW I haven't yet pulled the diff, but I will later this week if anyone wants any photos or summat. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clive Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 3.63 was fitted to spitfire 1500, so should be plentiful. In fact I several in my shed, hoping they will last OK in my zetec car, but spares ready to bolt in.Mk3 GT6 had the 3.89 (if overdrive) or 3.27 if no OD.Car will be marginally slower off the line with the 3.63, and a little more relaxed on the motorway. But a very good ratio for a 2 litre (or indeed, 2.5) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted July 18, 2011 Author Share Posted July 18, 2011 Ah! Clive, that's as it says in:http://club.triumph.org.uk/cgi-bin/forum10/Blah.pl?m-1154292216/ But not what Bill said here:http://club.triumph.org.uk/cgi-bin/forum10/Blah.pl?m-1224872868/s-84/highlight-spitfire+differential/#num84 ....and the ratios are just as you say, and in my Haynes manuals, and here:http://www.teglerizer.com/triumphstuff/spit_and_gt6_specs.htm ...but then there's a contradiction saying that a GT6 diff is a better idea, and that a 3.63 exists on the "drivetrain" section, here.http://www.triumphspitfire.com/substitute.htmlHence my confusion. Dag Nab It!I think you're right on the money though, so I'm going with you.(And you might want to lock up your shed nice and tight, in case I get desperate for one).Anyone got this combo who happens to be reading this, I'd love to know watcha make of it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT6 M Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Mk3 GT6 had the 3.89 (if overdrive) or 3.27 if no OD. says mr Clive,erm not quite true, some came out with the 3.27 and OD. :Pmainly MK2,s going by some factory blurb i seen yonks ago.Smithy, go for a 3.27. you have a lighter car than a ..Propppper GT ;) .. so should prove to be ok.Note, that you also have a lott more low down grunt than a Spitty, even a tuned one like Bob Spits. and he running a 3.27, told me its great.as for being slower off the mark, well yes and no, slower of the actuall mark yes, but slower further up, !!!! you got to mek moer gear changes, , gear changes take time, so its about evenalso Royston Hairbear was telling me, he took folk,s advice,and went for a 3.63, but now wishes he gone for a 3.27.so, 3.27 its got to be, so nee need to raid Ciftys shed now. ;)Marcus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heraldcoupe Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Though logic suggests the GT6 diff would be expected to handle higher power, the 1500 was the 'last of the line', and benefitted from all the improvements along the way. Result is that the 3.63:1 diff from the 1500 Spitfire is the strongest of all the standard production types, and most would reckon it's the best all-round ratio for a 6-cylinder Spit or GT6,Cheers,Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT6 M Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Bill, folk talk of the GT ones being weak, well its the actuall pinnion ive found, not the carrier, broke three, all lost a tooth of the pinnion, never any thing gone wrong wid the crown wheel, carrier,or planets.Marcus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAJ Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 My Dad has a 3.27:1 in his GT6 mk1 and a D-type o/d, it sports a T6 fabrications bodyshell but is road trimmed so a little lighter than standard, it was a 3.89:1 originally.He now has a very relaxed o/d top that equates to around 25mph per 1000rpm. He gets a genuine 38mpg travelling up to us at a steady 60-65mph, but still has 5 other ratios to play with if he wants to give it some beans. Still pulls well in o/d top for overtaking and long drags.Colin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted July 18, 2011 Author Share Posted July 18, 2011 Ah, Marcus, the 3.27!There's some stuff about the option here:http://club.triumph.org.uk/cgi-bin/forum10/Blah.pl?m-1231192341/ But again not definitive, perhaps, though Clives quite definite on the subject - and isn't the 3.27, indeed, rare? Ho hum!I should add, I've got the GT6 3 o/drive box in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 A GT6 with a 3.27 and OD is not fun to drive.I reckon 3.63 with OD— enough pep and a decent enough cruiser.They're sports cars after all, not for getting high MPG or worrying about a few hundred RPM at motorway speeds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 A GT6 with a 3.27 will be quicker to 60 than one with a 3.63 or 3.89 as it can do 65mph in second at the redline so you don't need that additional gearchange.Very long legged in OD-top sums it up though.Good for economy and relaxed cruising.I did know one guy who fitted a 2.9:1 diff, now that was a bit sluggish.Fit a 3.63 and get the best of all worlds.CheersColin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clive Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 3.27. rare?? Again, my shed had a few. In fact I broke 3 in my vitesse, and had acquired over the years another 3 spares in the shed. They have all found new owners.All 3 had mangled crown wheel and pinions. well, only took 2 apart, didn't bother with teh 3rd. Just fitted a 3.63 and didn't break any more.Marcus, I too have read that some of the earlier GT6's had 3.27 and OD. I thought it was the mk1's but have never seen an original car in that spec. In fact the only mk1 to pass through my hands had no od and a 4.11. Hmm, it was a well passed its best in all respects :'( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piman Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Hello Colin,"A GT6 with a 3.27 will be quicker to 60 than one with a 3.63 or 3.89 as it can do 65mph in second at the redline so you don't need that additional gearchange."That's being over selective in your data, but a lower geared car will always be livelier than a higher geared car.Alec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT6 M Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I did know one guy who fitted a 2.9:1 diff, now that was a bit sluggish., said Colin,and here was me with a 2.79 BMW diff in last year,!!! only took it out, cos I did no want to change the drive shafts, thing is, with a a PI set up or some more poke, a 3.27 gt / spitty is very nippy even in 4 th OD , [ infact 4 th j type od, is as quick as a standard in 3 rd, thru the increments. !!! ]so it does not make a 2.5 gt sluggish at all.Clive , not only the GTs, but quite a few Spittys came rom tha factory with a 3.27 as well,as did Dolly 1850, and some TR 7sMarcus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 A Spitfire with a 3.27 is nippy?A light Spit with a 2.5 on PI and a 3.27 is quick— driven one of those lots :)In fact it's quite nice as the rev limit feels further up because you are going quicker faster (makes sense in my head :) ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted July 18, 2011 Author Share Posted July 18, 2011 So, I tend to think 3.63, despite the many good arguments to the contrary, at the mo.I won't be doing much touring, (I won't be on the Motorway at all if I can help it), so the 3.63 seems to be about the middle ground - and that's where I usually am in most things. That's current thinking.How much to pay for the privilege of this swap do you think? A known good 3.63 should be costing me...? (I've been to Reamers web site and enjoyed the prices - I don't fancy an unknown from Ebay particularly. I can source one from a splendid bloke I know not too far away from here, but I could use a few "real world" price pointers from you cognoscenti, please...). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT6 M Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Smiffy, ev a talk with Bob Spit, before you jump the wrong way,maybe an ..Officer of the Law.. will sway you. ;) cos his is a 1300, and 3.27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted July 18, 2011 Author Share Posted July 18, 2011 Right-o Marcus, fear not, I won't jumped until pushed, and I always listen to my brothers in Blue! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clive Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 I'll be honest, never heard of a spitfire with a 3.27.I know the dolly 1850 autos had them, but again didn't know about the TR7's. If (when??) I get through my stock of diffs I will be looking at the subaru conversion. How hard can it be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jones Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 Subaru don't do anything taller than 3.54:1 and most are 4.11:1.I quite like the 3.63 in the Vitesse, but that is only 2L with brick outhouse aerodynamics. 3K rpm at 70mph with a 0.79 OD 5th. It would pull a 3.27 but it would take the edge off. 2.5 would definitely need at least a 3.27 IMO.Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottie55 Posted July 18, 2011 Share Posted July 18, 2011 My vitesse estate 2.5PI has a 3.63 diff and has O/D. Feels a pretty good combination. I guess it could probably live with a 3.27 to lower the higher speed revs but I'd worry the lesser acceleration would be a disappointment. If my calcs are right, its a 10% reduction in acceleration gearing. But on the other hand, its still 90% :) So eg, 0-60 in 8 seconds would become 8.8 seconds. Probably quite noticeable. :-/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 piman wrote:Hello Colin,"A GT6 with a 3.27 will be quicker to 60 than one with a 3.63 or 3.89 as it can do 65mph in second at the redline so you don't need that additional gearchange."That's being over selective in your data, but a lower geared car will always be livelier than a higher geared car.Alecslightly over-selective.:-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard B Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 After breaking a 3.27 diff, I then went to 3.63 in the 2500 PI Spitfire. However I have 14" wheels with 195/65 x 14 tyres.Now considering the Subaru diff conversion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted July 19, 2011 Author Share Posted July 19, 2011 Richy, may I ask why are you moving on to Suby, especially if Nick's right about the ratios? (He usually is). Strength? Ratio? LSD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 796 wrote:I did know one guy who fitted a 2.9:1 diff, now that was a bit sluggish., said Colin,and here was me with a 2.79 BMW diff in last year,!!! only took it out, cos I did no want to change the drive shafts, I should have qualified that a bit more, he had a standard Mk2 2000 saloon engine I think, so not exactly endowed with power, but he was making use of the torque (so he said :-) )CheersColin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard B Posted July 19, 2011 Share Posted July 19, 2011 smithy wrote:Strength? Yes, I broke the 3.63 Autosolo'ing as well. :osmithy wrote:Ratio? 3.54 is pretty close to 3.63 (I have 14" wheels)smithy wrote: LSD? Yes ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.