Jump to content

Engine Health Check


Don Cook

Recommended Posts

I'm thinking about taking the head off my early 71 MK3 GT6 for a clean up. I had it modified a few years ago for unleaded and had a go at flowing as well (as per Kaz Kastner'd booklet). I'll replace the rockers as they are pitted and, fingers crossed, that should be it for the head.

However, because I'm getting oil leaks (I'll check/divert the engine breather first) I was thinking about replacing the piston rings and while the sump is off, possibly the con rod shells. Now, is this a good idea, wondering if there is any ovality it might be best to leave them. Also what else can be replaced with just the sump off...crankshaft shims maybe?

Am I likely to experience any probs doing this just by removing the sump? I'm not having a complete strip of the engine, just climbing around the top and underneath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did this a long time ago. You have to undo the engine mounts and jack up the engine on one side to wiggle the sump out. I did it because I had massive end float and I did get those bearings in. Also changed the con road shells as they were in the kit but, as to the main bearings, I don't remember, not sure how I could have got them in.

Also while you've got the sump off replace that horrible leak prone aluminium piece at the lower front of the block with a steel one.

And did changing the bearings fix my engine? No it didn't! After six months end float as bad as before and oil turning to jelly. All due to elongated S shape wear it the bores caused by original massive end float. All fixed by my first re-bore and regrind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good story DougBGT6, this happens alot. You go to fix the immediate problem when really its just a symptom of other things going wrong. That coupled with the crap bearing metal we get these days is the reason I'm no longer using the triumph unit.

Don let us know how you get on and what you decide to do.

Chris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As above, if you've got decent oil pressure when hot, no nasty noises on cold starts, no excessive crank end-float and not using loads of oil, I'd be inclined to leave well alone.

Doing the bearings from below on a GT6 or Vitesse is a miserable job though it is just about possible to change all the bearings (including mains).  Changing rings means that the bores MUST be honed.  While I suppose it is possible to do this with a flex-hone (or similar) in an electric drill, I don't see how you'd ever get things clean enough afterwards.  It's not that hard to get the engine to do it properly if you really think it needs doing.

Cheers

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8009 wrote:
I'm thinking about taking the head off my early 71 MK3 GT6 for a clean up. I had it modified a few years ago for unleaded and had a go at flowing as well (as per Kaz Kastner'd booklet). I'll replace the rockers as they are pitted and, fingers crossed, that should be it for the head.

However, because I'm getting oil leaks (I'll check/divert the engine breather first) I was thinking about replacing the piston rings and while the sump is off, possibly the con rod shells. Now, is this a good idea, wondering if there is any ovality it might be best to leave them. Also what else can be replaced with just the sump off...crankshaft shims maybe?

Am I likely to experience any probs doing this just by removing the sump? I'm not having a complete strip of the engine, just climbing around the top and underneath.


Don

It's a Triumph, it leaks!

If you still insist, do a proper job and take the engine out. I can borrow a crane for you if needed.

Cheers

Colin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Doug,

"Also while you've got the sump off replace that horrible leak prone aluminium piece at the lower front of the block with a steel one. "

As long as the bridge strip is assembled correctly and the sump bolts that screw into it are not overtightned, stripping the threads then it is as good as steel. If I find a stripped thread I would simply helicoil it, I see little point in having to find a steel bridge?

Alec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Alec,

But I've had it happen to me and I've heard about it too many times from others to think it's not a problem, the thing is weak link and frequently a major source of leakage. As to availability another club has it in their shop and I believe it's a best seller.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Doug,

in what way is steel better in this application?  I don't doubt that the shop you refer to sells plenty of them but that is not an indication of it's superiority.
I can understand those with limited resources replacing a damaged bridge piece due to stripped threads which is fair enough.

Alec

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alex,

Number 1 it doesn't leak.

And number 2 it doesn't leak  ;D

I have repaired the aluminium one in the past as you describe. It lasts about 6 month and then....... it leaks.

I think Duckhams sponsored Triumph to install the original to increase oil sales.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A steel bridge also provides strength to the engine block, particularly in the 6 cylinder block which is longer than the 4, so that's an added extra to preventing stripping the threads.

It's quite a common modification for those tuning the 6 cylinder, especially on overbores, to replace the alloy parts with a kit of steel pieces (bridging piece, rear oil seal and main caps) to provide torsional strength to the engine block.

Don't know how beneficial that would be to the 4 cylinder blocks, but given that the bottom end weakness on the 4cyl is caused by oil film breakdown as a byproduct of crankshaft flexibility, I suppose every little thing that makes the block more stable would be of benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

esxefi wrote:
how does it add strength?


I suppose it will add strength to the "flex" of the motor. Not had personnel experience with the 6 yet, but going by what rover did with the V8 for the same reasons, when they cross bolted their blocks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a link to Canley’s spares catalogue for the engine. The item in question is 151134.

http://www.canleyclassics.com/?xhtml=xhtml/diagram/gt6mkiiiengineunitcylinderblocklinersoilpressureswitch.html&xhtmlcatalogue=xhtml/catalogue/gt6mkiii.html&category=engine&xsl=diagram.xsl

Notice items 36234 which are wooden   :-/  packing pieces.

The leak is between 151134 and the sump. Two of the sump bolts screw into 151134. Steel bolts, aluminium thread. No matter how carefully you torque them up, do not over tighten, do not under tighten, eventually it leaks. Spillage for me was about an egg cup full a week, doesn’t sound like much but it used to drive my Dad insane!  He was very proud of his garage floor!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither of my cars leak from there.  One is original 45 year Triumph build and one is a recent red monkey build.  Blocks do sometimes need careful straightening before use due to previous over-tightening.  The bolts really don't need to be very tight for everything to seal.  Over tightening distorts things and causes leaks.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway...

Oil comes out in the usual places indicating crankcase pressure build up. Oil started spewing out on the 10CR (2011) along with a real problem keeping the carbs in tune (I had re-fitted original Strombergs for economy and they're still on), wasn't much better during the following La Carrera Caledonia, since then I haven't used it. Engine doesn't knock. I suppose the first thing to do is get her running, I'll put back the SUs and make sure engine ventilation is working as it should and then find out the oil pressure. Any recommends as what type oil pressure gauge to use and where to site it (I have a radio/CD so no room there). Combined water/oil gauge, can you still get these?

Does anyone know the order/sequence of the internal gubbins of the Smith's emission control valve (toward the top left of picture), I might have re-assembled mine incorrectly (can't find exploded view on the web)?

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well, a whole two months later all I have done is rebuild the Smiths engine breather valve, it was assembled wrongly. Plus, I have used a very, very old Redex compression tester. I didn't have enough hands and it was raining but I got readings as follows:  1 = 125, 2 = 125, 3 = 125, 4 = 60, 5 = 60, 6 = 125. These are approx as, in the time and rain,  I could only measure while spinning the engine over.

I assume that I have a head gasket go between cylinders 4 and 5, compression being lost between the two? Would this be a cause for crankcase pressure to build up or is compression just being lost between pots 4 and 5, what do you think?

Not used this for two years...getting quite excited now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems like 2 pistons go together is a bit strange
BUTT, if waters been getting in, woe knows.

generally crankcase wont pressurise unless the blow is toward the tappet chest, as this will let air into sump.

nee water coming oot, so its gotta be between the cyls
moer than likely the fire ring has blown thru
just hope it aint ..flame cut.. into the block !!!

get it offfff
M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...